On Sunday 23 January 2005 09:58, Chris Gianelloni wrote: (B> On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 00:52 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: (B> > On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:45:24 -0500 Chris Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (B> > (B> > wrote: (B> > | The fact that eclasses cannot be removed from the tree is important. (B> > (B> > Mmmm, didn't Nick fix that a while back? (B> (B> Yeah... but there are still portage versions out there that don't save (B> the eclass in /var/db/pkg, so for the time being this is true. (B (BNo, it's not fixed. Brian Harring's changes in HEAD do fix this issue, but (Bthey won't be released for some time. (B (BRegards, (BJason Stubbs (B (B-- ([email protected] mailing list
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versione... Jason Stubbs
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versioned ec... Patrick Lauer
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versione... Ciaran McCreesh
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versione... Stuart Herbert
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versione... Ciaran McCreesh
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versione... Chris Gianelloni
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versioned eclasse... Chris Gianelloni
- [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Versioned ec... Chris Frey
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Vers... Ciaran McCreesh
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Vers... Chris Gianelloni
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Vers... Jason Stubbs
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Vers... Chris Gianelloni
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Vers... Donnie Berkholz
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Vers... Jason Stubbs
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versioned ec... Malte S. Stretz
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versione... Chris Gianelloni
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versione... Malte S. Stretz
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versioned eclasses John Mylchreest
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versioned eclasses Daniel Goller
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versioned eclasses John Mylchreest
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Versioned eclasses Chris Gianelloni
