On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:28:00 +0100 Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 17:11 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > Your entire argument is flawed based upon the "tree-breaking change"
| > thing. We don't commit tree-breaking changes to eclasses any more
| > than we do to ebuilds.
| 
| But, since there usually is more than one version of an ebuild, I can
| mask the b0rked version and use the previously installed one.
| 
| How do I do that with eclasses?

Pull an older version from cvsweb. But then, since we don't commit
broken changes to eclasses, this is irrelevant.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Attachment: pgpiNRt4XX5nN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to