maillog: 02/02/2005-09:05:59(+0100): foser types
> On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 09:34 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > [some dev please forward this to gentoo-user]
> > 
> > it seems our new SLOT-ed ebuilds of autoconf / automake / libtool
> > have users confused.  'why does emerge want to install so many !?'
> > you ask yourself outloud.  the truth is, nothing has changed on your
> > system, you just *think* something is different.
> > 
> > the old ebuilds (autoconf-2.59-r5 / automake-1.8.5-r1 /
> > libtool-1.5.2-r7) actually downloaded and installed multiple
> > versions of each package.  you *thought* you had just one autoconf,
> > but boy oh boy were you wrong !
> > 
> > in the future i'd like to make package maintainers be a little less
> > lazy and declare what version of autoconf / automake / libtool they
> > wish to run in their ebuilds so that, in the normal scheme of
> > things, you only have the versions installed on your system that you
> > need ... perhaps a pipe dream, but when you live with Ramereth, you
> > need them :(
> 
> On any self built system you will probably need every version anyway,
> so yeah it's dream.

Do you mean that the packages in "system" require all versions anyway?
If the packages in "system" can go without some particular version, then
I am pretty sure that it *should* be possible to go without that
version.

> But again this gets pitched _after_ the change has been made & already
> generated possible bugreports I had no lead on until this got
> mentioned here. Introduce it, fine. Communicate it, the first step in
> the process, not the last.

-- 
 )   Georgi Georgiev    ) Someone on IRC was very sad about the         )
(     [EMAIL PROTECTED]    (  uptime of his machine wrapping from 497      (
 )  +81(90)6266-1163    ) days to 0. -- linux-kernel                    )

Attachment: pgpjR4QcYtA4h.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to