050208 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > I am 100% willing to drop nano in favor for vim on the stages, > but I am not willing to argue it. If you can convince people > that the default editor should be vim, I'll back you, > but I am definitely not going to lead that flame-fest.
</spectate> wasn't there a long thread last year about the present install method being a kind of entrance exam for new users, to keep out nerds'n'such ? wouldn't it advance that cause to replace Nano with Vim ? also, if there is reason to include a simple editor, is Nano the best ? Joe does some hiliting & my recently-discovered choice is 'e3ne', when i'm in a remote subdirectory & don't want to start another Vim . <spectate> -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto -- [email protected] mailing list
