On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:18:18 -0500, Stephen P. Becker > Seeing as it is in package.mask for a reason, do you really have to ask > this question?
Sure. beta1 was in pacakge.mask also and worked great. Just want to verify that its a problem with the ebuilds and not something I've done wrong. Is package.mask supposed to be used for things completely untested now though? -- I always thought its for upstream dev releases or things known to be broken. -- [email protected] mailing list
