On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 08:44:56PM +0000, Roman Gaufman wrote: > > Is package.mask supposed to be used for things completely untested now > though? -- I always thought its for upstream dev releases or things > known to be broken.
if something is completely untested, it might as well be assumed to be broken. Either way, p.mask means all bets are off. (: -pete -- Peter Johanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- [email protected] mailing list
