On Wednesday 23 February 2005 02:23 pm, Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 19:00 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > sys-storage: or move stuff to sys-fs? > > If we go how sys-fs looks now, mdadm should go to sys-fs as well, as > raidtools, lvm, evms, etc are there already.
i like having sys-fs / sys-hardware ... having sys-storage just kind of blurs the lines ... > > sys-network: or move stuff to net-*? > > You might consider them more critical to get the system up, so more > system related? nah, most of those packages arent even on a typical machine unless the user emerges em :) ... i'd vote for disseminating them into other sys- or net- categories netboot-base should go along side baselayout since they serve [pretty much] the same function -mike -- [email protected] mailing list
