Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 19:00 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
sys-storage: or move stuff to sys-fs?
If we go how sys-fs looks now, mdadm should go to sys-fs as well, as raidtools, lvm, evms, etc are there already.
But these are not really file systems per say, I would say more sys-block or sys-rbm (random block management) or sys-blockdev ...
Also, some things are a bit vague, like hdparm might rather go to
sys-hardware.
sys-block
A thought might be to move all these (except hdparm, etc), as well as
sys-fs to sys-storage rather. If we really go by sys-fs means to me at
least, it probably should only be the fsck's, and devfs/udev that stay
there if any.
devfs/udev are in fact pseudofs ... so they could be splitted in the future if ever needed...
Phil -- [email protected] mailing list
