Francesco Riosa wrote:

Mike Frysinger wrote:

On Sunday 10 April 2005 05:22 pm, Spider wrote:

the ~x86 version doesn't exhibit this problem, btw. stabilizing this
version might be prudent.

1.5.14 doesnt have any open issues for it so i've pushed it to stable

emerge -pv gcc
[ebuild     U ] sys-devel/gcc- [3.3.5-r1] (-altivec)
-bootstrap -boundschecking -build -debug -fortran -gcj -gtk -hardened
(-ip28) (-multilib) -multislot (-n32) (-n64) +nls -nocxx -objc -static
(-uclibc) 0 kB


* Configuring GCC with:


*** This configuration is not supported in the following subdirectories:
target-libffi target-boehm-gc target-zlib target-libjava target-libf2c zlib fastjar target-libobjc
(Any other directories should still work fine.)
Created "Makefile" in /var/tmp/portage/gcc- using "mt-frag"
gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `as': No such file or directory
*** The command 'gcc -o conftest -O2 -march=i686 conftest.c' failed.
*** You must set the environment variable CC to a working compiler.

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc- failed.
!!! Function gcc_do_configure, Line 1048, Exitcode 1
!!! failed to run configure
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message.

and this are the packages emerged few seconds before (gmt times)

    Mon Apr 11 10:27:19 2005 >>> sys-apps/texinfo-4.8
    Mon Apr 11 10:27:43 2005 >>> sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.10-r2
    Mon Apr 11 10:27:56 2005 >>> sys-devel/binutils-config-1.8-r2
    Mon Apr 11 10:37:17 2005 >>> sys-devel/binutils-

can anyone explain me why updating this fundamentals packages is so fragile also on a *stable* x86 installation ?

-- mailing list

Reply via email to