On Tue, 10 May 2005 21:54:33 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Is there a standard way of handling testing for utility-type eclasses?
| For versionator I currently have a __versionator__test_blah function
| included in the eclass (source versionator.eclass works, it doesn't
| have any portage-specific code), but this is going to get a bit messy
| when I add in another few dozen tests...

And along the same lines... Please test the updated versionator.eclass
that I have posted to [1]. I'd really rather find any bugs *before* it
hits the tree :)

[1]: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87157

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Attachment: pgpQYcM9Z09LQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to