Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >Is there a standard way of handling testing for utility-type eclasses? >For versionator I currently have a __versionator__test_blah function >included in the eclass (source versionator.eclass works, it doesn't have >any portage-specific code), but this is going to get a bit messy when I >add in another few dozen tests... > >Maybe a simple test harness could be added as an option for the new >eclass / elib setup? > > > ciaranm, would you commit it ? -- [email protected] mailing list
- [gentoo-dev] Tests for eclasses Ciaran McCreesh
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Tests for eclasses Ciaran McCreesh
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Tests for eclasses Francesco Riosa
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Tests for eclasses Aaron Walker
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Tests for eclasses Brian Harring
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Tests for eclasses Ciaran McCreesh
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Tests for eclasses Francesco Riosa
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Tests for eclasses Ciaran McCreesh
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Tests for eclasses Francesco Riosa
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Tests for eclasses Ciaran McCreesh
