On Wednesday 11 May 2005 05:20 pm, Francesco Riosa wrote: > what we have: > At the moment have_NPTL is defined in eclass/eutils.eclass, it compile a > small test program to check if glibc have nptl support.
hasnt this been outgrown ? people should `use nptl` now i think > there are drawbacks on the use of getconfig (that come with glibc) ? > Maybe it's not supported from *libc ? well i'd point out that glibc is the only libc atm to implement NPTL ... but then i'd point out someone is working on it for uClibc ... -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
