Mike Frysinger wrote: >On Wednesday 11 May 2005 05:20 pm, Francesco Riosa wrote: > > >>what we have: >>At the moment have_NPTL is defined in eclass/eutils.eclass, it compile a >>small test program to check if glibc have nptl support. >> >> > >hasnt this been outgrown ? people should `use nptl` now i think > > yes and no, no, 2005.0 still default to -ntpl and -ntplonly yes, it's used only by mono project ebuilds (grep has spoken)
> > >>there are drawbacks on the use of getconfig (that come with glibc) ? >>Maybe it's not supported from *libc ? >> >> > >well i'd point out that glibc is the only libc atm to implement NPTL ... but >then i'd point out someone is working on it for uClibc ... >-mike > > mmh ok, btw all variant of glibc had getconf ? -- [email protected] mailing list
