>I may not have interpreted your message correctly. If I inferred something
>from it that you didn't intend to convey, please clarify.
>
>Developing the Portage software itself is an entirely different process than
>creating an ebuild: unless you're planning to contribute enhancement code to
>Gentoolkit or Portage, they're just a set of tools for package development and
>management. In order to create an ebuild, you need to know what package you
>/want/ to bring into the tree. Randomly submitting ebuilds that will shortly
>thereafter be without a home is only a recipe for neglected packages.
>
>
>
I'm aware of the fact that building portage related software is
different from creating ebuilds. I'm interested in the openoffice
ebuilds, as well as scheme and some lisp related ebuilds.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
