-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Joseph Jezak wrote:
Agreed, the PPC team is very good at arbitrarily marking things stable
whenever they feel like it, and often times before the maintainer does.
This is not usually our policy. However, because we moved GCC-3.4 to
stable before many arches, there were a number of packages that needed
to be marked stable for PPC in order for the stable version to even
compile. What should we have done in this case then?
Assuming there wasn't a very compelling, "stuff is horribly broken in
gcc-3.3.x" type reason, wait for the maintainer arch.
- --
Jason Wever
Gentoo/Sparc Co-Team Lead
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCpxtqdKvgdVioq28RAjm7AJ9psRHMb8LYB6KqAhdi/jAzKj2j8ACglq3s
s8L6J7Ims/ZPt6upqMrgtlU=
=M1Z0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
