On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 14:08 -0400, Eric Brown wrote: > My point is that Snort and Apache are not alone in this, so I suppose > quite a few upstream developers just disagree with us on what proper > initialization means. Why should our users suffer?
They shouldn't, but that doesn't mean implementing some half-baked hack to resolve the situation. It might be better to instead patch the daemon in question and send the patches upstream. Upstream developers (usually) are much more willing to make changes when you've done the work for them... ;] -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
