On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 16:43 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> not to detract from the discussion, but...anyone else notice this?

He quoted me.  His text was above mine.

People have met me.  They know I exist.  Though Eric might be a figment
of my shattered subconscious psyche.  Who knows?  :P

> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 14:40:01 -0400
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > They shouldn't, but that doesn't mean implementing some half-baked
> > hack to resolve the situation.  It might be better to instead patch
> > the daemon in question and send the patches upstream.  Upstream
> > developers (usually) are much more willing to make changes when you've
> > done the work for them... ;]
> > 
> 
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:39:16 -0400
> "Eric Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > They shouldn't, but that doesn't mean implementing some half-baked
> > hack to resolve the situation.  It might be better to instead patch
> > the daemon in question and send the patches upstream.  Upstream
> > developers (usually) are much more willing to make changes when you've
> > done the work for them... ;]
> > 
> 
> I'm beginning to suspect Eric and Chris are the same person. Prove they
> aren't - show evidence of them independently in the same room at the
> same time ;)
> 
> (and being a mid-stream developer, I know *I* like working patches more
> than 'fix your junk, it broke' reports)
-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager
Games - Developer
Gentoo Linux

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to