On Sunday 04 September 2005 10:37 am, Grant Goodyear wrote: > This policy for x86 is quite different from how every other arch marks > packages stable. For the non-x86 archs, each arch has a specific "arch > team" which is responsible for moving packages from ``~arch`` to ``arch``. > This approach has worked quite well for the non-x86 archs, and this GLEP > asserts that the same approach would benefit x86 as well.
this isnt quite true ... non-x86 archs usually take their queues for when packages should be moved to stable from the maintainer of the package in other words, arch teams generally defer to maintainers (and rightly so) as to when newer versions should go stable -mike -- [email protected] mailing list
