On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 9:44:41 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On 5/9/2005 1:29:57, Ciaran McCreesh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: | > On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 1:12:54 +0200 "Kevin F. Quinn" | > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > wrote: | > | 3) All packages need to be assigned an x86 arch team member | > | responsible. | > | > Why? | | Because if only the x86 arch team can mark stuff stable, anything | without representation on the x86 arch team will stay unstable | forever. Maybe rather than one specific arch team member, several | would undertake to manage otherwise unassigned packages.
There are currently ~700 packages which are not visible to x86 or ~x86 users. Do these need an x86 arch team member? Is it the aim of the x86 arch team to cover the entire tree, or only things which are useful to x86 users? -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgpvmLgCzGKzf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
