-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stephen P. Becker wrote:
>> You're somehow implying that being an AT is not as good as being a dev.
> 
> 
> Wrong.
> 
>> My understanding is that this GLEP is supposed to make AT as good as
>> being a dev, but with a different role, one that doesn't need commit
>> access.
> 
> 
> My point exactly!  Why have another category?
> 
>> If the people involved decide they want to become committing
>> devs, it also make it easier to make that transition.  If they don't
>> want to commit, they can stay as an AT.
> 
> 
> Then shall we reclassify all the developers that currently don't have
> commit access to the portage tree?
> 
> -Steve

And how is an "Arch Dev" different from say a member of devrel?  It's
not a category per se, it's a role.  Person X does Devrel, person Y does
portage, you do Arch Developing on MIPS, and new dev Z is an Arch
Tester.  How does this make anything more difficult than it already is?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
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=S6q7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to