maillog: 03/10/2005-08:56:57(-0400): Chris Gianelloni types > On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 13:21 -0400, Dan Meltzer wrote: > > Hi, I would just like some clarification if at all possible. > > > > Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran > > into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was > > supposed to be completely autonomous, and any user interaction should > > take place in ebuild ... config. > > > > Apparantly one of us is {in,}correct, but I cannot find any > > documentation although I'm fairly sure I have read it.. > > Ebuilds *should* be non-interactive. There are a few exceptions to > this, such as ones triggered by USE flags (ala webapp-config.eclass) and > ones triggered by necessity (ala games from CD).
Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was use-flag based RESTRICT... -- () Georgi Georgiev () Harrison's Postulate: For every action, () () [EMAIL PROTECTED] () there is an equal and opposite criticism. () () +81(90)2877-8845 () ()
pgpbYLAC9vZvf.pgp
Description: PGP signature