Kurt Lieber wrote:
Because, in practice, this doesn't happen. Accounts (or, in this case, email addresses) stay around until someone gets enough of a bee under their bonnet to do somethig about it. Since there's no pain or cost for the AT/HT project lead, there's no reason for them to be vigilant about tracking activity. Plus, assuming we have a large number of these testers, how are people going to know whether or not one specific arch tester is active? That's not an acceptable solution.
Uhm, does that implicitly mean there is such a tracking method for devs (where dev = dev/staff/whatever)? There are devs who don't have commit permissions to any cvs repo, how is their activity tracked?
In the AT case it wouldn't be so hard to check their activity. !seen on IRC and a bugzilla query printing out bugs where they made a comment should be enough, IMHO.
-- Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [email protected] mailing list
