Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:29:36PM -0800, Tuan Van wrote:
Luis F. Araujo wrote:
Hello everyone,
A few days ago i glanced over package.mask , and i was surprised
about how many non-existent ebuild/packages entries are there.
please adjust your script.
=cat/foo-1.2 is valid even though foo-1.2 is no longer in the tree. I
looked at the top 4 line in your list, they are all valid entries.
yes, i imagine there are a bunch of these false positives ... you can
see the gcc-config mask is wrongly flagged for this reason
-mike
Yes, the script as you might already noticed only checks for specific
ebuilds versions entries.
I will try to tweak a it a bit more so it could filter more properly
the list.
Oh, and i am using a small interpreter i am writing for the script ,
so _many_ things are being proved here, so bear with me :-)
--
[email protected] mailing list
