Marius Mauch wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:26:03 +0200
Alin Nastac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
If not, i *personally* could go slowly removing the entries, along
with other people willing to help, or any other _better_ suggestion
to deal with this?
Don't do this without explicitly checking with the maintainer for a
package (if existant). Generally redundant entries in package.mask
don't hurt, so if it's not absolutely clear that the entry is not
needed anymore keep it.
Hmm.. I fail to see why package.mask shouldn't be cleaned without
everyone's consent.
Assuming the script is correct, why would you contact the maintainer
of package foe when the oldest version in the current tree is bigger
than the masked one?
Because there are more scenarios than the one you see.
Marius
That's precisely why i m asking for every dev taking care of
their own scenarios *if possible*.
--
[email protected] mailing list
