On Monday 26 December 2005 03:28, Chris White wrote: > I'm not sure if we're on the same page as far as the target audience of > this change. The target audience is developers/those with strict in their > features. Actually "stricter", and there are way too many people to put that in without knowing what that do... or is it a default nowadays, I'm not even sure.
> I've always found dodoc should > be checked anyways, and if we're assuming the documentation consists of the > formentioned items, then we're also having the situation of missing other > important documentation as well. Take KDE-related packages.. a good 90% of those have just the files I named or a subset of them as documentation, for those, the eclass already take care of them definitely. When there's something _more_, it can be dodoc-ed by hand. But it would fail if someone didn't put a NEWS file or a ChangeLog ... that seems stupid to me. Also, I think jakub is totally right with this. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
pgpLC1euV5lJJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
