-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lance Albertson wrote: | All of those of course are true. I guess I'm thinking more in the large | picture of things. Retiring non-active devs isn't something I'd exactly | call 'ground breaking' :-). I know there are things being worked on now | that will probably be in that category. I was mainly looking at the long | term flow of ground breaking progress we've made. Sure, we've made lots | of great improvements, but I'm concerned that we have too many | subprojects all working in their little world and no one really looking | over the whole project making sure things flow together well. There's no | one out there who's responsibility is to track all these subprojects and | make sure things are flowing right.
Shouldn't that be the council's job? | I dunno, I just get the impression that people fear having a goal to | work on and would rather just let things work out in a random way (like | they have been for a while now). I'm not wanting to take the fun out of | this, but I feel more structure and less redtape would help make us move | forward faster and better. More structure and less red tape ... How do those two work together? I feel like they're connected -- a more structured organization will have more bureaucracy and more red tape. Thanks, Donnie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDuuAIXVaO67S1rtsRAuEtAJ0c+WO0EGbIURhk+LQFl/sKp938/wCdFqJU i8ID3a3B/FoAq1FVFzlNjLw= =OxkM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
