On Saturday 14 January 2006 13:24, Alexandre Buisse wrote:
> for all of you who have been using latex on gentoo, here are some news
> on what is currently happening.
>
> First of all, we have a new tetex (tetex-3.0_p1). It should have hit the
> mirrors this morning. This is not an official release from upstream
> (that would be 3.1) but a snapshot of their development tree that
> corrects some bugs with the autotools (see bug #113024). If we manage to
> solve the etex related problems (all the "Fatal error: I'm stymied"), it
> could be a good candidate for stabilisation.

I am using tetex-3 on my amd64 system, I haven't had any problems with it so 
far in what I do. I will certainly test the new version and put it through 
its paces as I write up my thesis!
>
> A very exciting package has been added to portage lately, but it's still
> quite experimental : dev-tex/mpm (only keyworded ~x86 and hard-masked at
> the moment). It's basically the MikTeX package manager adapted for unix
> systems. As the texmf tree is always organized in the same way, it can
> interact with tetex quite nicely. Basically, you tell it which package
> you want from CTAN and it installs it automatically. It has so far been
> tested by a few people, including me, and seems to work fine without
> corrupting anything. However, it needs a lot more testing before even
> going to ~arch. Please report bugs or success in bug #110494 if you give
> it a try.
>
I will try to find some time to test that out as I get chance on amd64.

> And, last but not least, a LaTeX doc began. It's still a very early
> draft but any (constructive) criticism and help is most welcome. The
> discussion happens in bug #118405 and the last draft can be found on my
> devpage (http://dev.gentoo.org/~nattfodd).

If I can find time I may well be able to help you out a little with that. It 
is looking good already. I write my presentations in LaTeX beamer, and use 
Kile as an editor. Although I have also converted people to the ways of LaTeX 
using the easy entry LyX affords you ;)

Attachment: pgpvU71nIDWqo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to