On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:17, Alec Warner wrote: > I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a > really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask > entries were really referencing anything or not. Luckily Brian was able > to write a much better one for bcportage. > > So the list of invalid masks is at [1]. > The script source is at [2]. > > Please have a look and see if any of the packages are yours. Entries in > package.mask should have a corresponding ebuild in the tree somewhere. > I'd like to see the number of entries chopped by a fair margin. > All of the KDE stuff is the upcoming 3.5.1 release which we are working on in p.mask until the official release. There *are* ebuilds for all this stuff in the tree right now. So that has chopped the number of entries by a fair margin, but for the script to be useful it should be able to detect they have valid ebuilds.
pgpV8E3x76qAx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
