On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:17:24 -0500
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I figured it was time for a bit of cleaning... I ended up writing a
> really crappy script for stable to do a check of whether package.mask
> entries were really referencing anything or not.  Luckily Brian was
> able to write a much better one for bcportage.

Why are people so obsessed with cleaning package.mask all the time?
Sure makes sense to remove three year old unused entries from time to
time, but not everything that isn't actively used is invalid
automatically (quite sure that kde-3.5.1 stuff is a preventive mask
for example).

Marius

-- 
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to