Chris Gianelloni wrote:

> Which you won't have to deal with for long, 2006.0 is being worked on as
> we speak.  The basic jist of this is that what you are seeing is pretty
> much expected behavior for bootstrapping using a stage with an older
> GCC.

The way I read it, the gcc-3.4.4-r1.ebuild includes a dependency on
libstdc++-v3 and =sys-devel/gcc-3.3* if "build" is not in your USE
environment.  The bootstrap during bootstrap.sh sets that build flag.  Any
subsequent installs of gcc-3.4.4-r1 are going to install libstdc++-v3, no
matter what you do (at least x86 users).  Or maybe I am just reading that
PDEPEND wrong.

Regardless, I have never had to mask out lower versions of gcc before.  I
assumed the reason for the dependency was a half ass attempt to keep idiots
from thoughtlessly destroying their toolchain.

-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to