28.2.2006, 16:42:46, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:26:37 +0100 Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | If you can't do any better, then please apologize for your conduct
> | and false claims and shut up... TIA.

> Sure I can do better. But you didn't originally ask for better, you
> asked for anything. If better's what you're after:

>     SLOT="${PVR}"

Eh? Seen kernel2.eclass? Going to file a bug about that as well? Seen
gst/gstreamer eclasses? Going to file QA bugs about them as well? And -
what's exactly the QA violation there, if you could enlighten us?

Maybe I could point you to
http://dev.gentoo.org/~plasmaroo/devmanual//general-concepts/slotting/ ?

> Now, please apologise for insinuating that I don't have any real claims
> to make. I find it extremely offensive that you're questioning my
> technical ability.

No, I won't apologize, I don't see any reason to do it after all the baloney
you've shown here. I have to agree w/ rl03 that your benefits for this whole
project are net negative.


-- 
Best regards,

 Jakub Moc
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95  B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E

 ... still no signature ;)

Attachment: pgpEIQRV01qb0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to