>> which part dont you understand ? the user sets a variable and then is told >> that the package probably contains a bug ... seems pretty confusing to me >> -mike > > rl03 already replied to that. I don't see any QA issues there, and if > someone from QA team does, then he probably has too much time to ponder over > the tree and invent issues where they don't exist. I don't see any point > "fixing" this, at least until FEATURES="mindreader" is implemented. Portage > QA notices may be equally confusing to the users, with this kind of logic, > yet they stay there - and number of people complaining about USE_EXPAND > notices is much higher than the number of people who complained about > confusing ewarn from webapps slot (exactly zero is far as I could find). > > Once again, don't invent problems, please.
Nobody is inventing problems Jakub. Just because nobody has yet complained does not mean that there is not a problem. If you can't see the QA issues, then you really need to stop commenting in this thread, because there are a lot of people who know better. Furthermore, you are playing right into the hands of He Whom I Will Not Name, thus allowing yourself to be trolled into sounding like an idiot in public. You suffered from the same problem in the bbapm thread recently. -Steve -- [email protected] mailing list
