Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 01 March 2006 19:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> Unless there are any huge flaws found, I'd like this to be voted on by >> the council -- looks like it'll have to wait until April's meeting to >> fit in with the two weeks rule. > > may push council meeting back to 3rd tuesday if people wish
I'd certainly like to see GLEP 42 addressed this month, if at all possible. That said, the two-weeks rule is to avoid inconveniencing the Council and unfairly springing something upon the devs without a chance to look at the details. It's certainly a good rule, but I don't think it should be considered inviolable. If there is an emergency, or the issue is sufficiently well known that the entire two weeks notice seems unnecessary, then I would think the Council could decide to make an exception. -g2boojum-
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
