Alexandre Buisse wrote: > On Tue, Apr 4, 2006 at 00:37:12 +0200, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > >>On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 17:38:48 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>wrote: >>| i dont see how anyone can be against this (unless you're a >>| terrorist!) >> >>I for one welcome our new infra overlords. Perhaps you should add in a >>clause saying that infra will randomly (maybe with the help of a >>keyword filter) inspect emails sent to all @gentoo.org addresses for >>any signs of subversive activity. You could also add a clause saying >>that developers must hand over their harddrives to infra upon request so >>that security audits can be performed. > > > I fail to see how your remark relates to the document. It's not about > anti-terrorism measures or anything, it's just about good behaviour so > gentoo can work properly and we can all have fun working in it. Or > should we start another flame each time a document is posted to -dev?
Sorry, but you aren't a Gentoo developer and don't have access to some mailing list archives. If you were, you'd know. Sure, the part about good will etc is good. Anyway, I don't think this is a good place for such discusion. -core? Cheers, -jkt -- cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
