On Tuesday 04 April 2006 11:12, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > Surely the question isn't whether the upgrade is perfect, but whether > it's better than the current stable release?
Exactly. > (I realise that isn't a perfect patch count...) Exactly. > I think at this point it does more harm than good to be lagging behind > the current upstream kde - last time I checked the kde bugzilla > wouldn't even accept bug reports for the kde currently marked stable > as it was too old, and if bugs can't be filed then it's clearly > "unsupported upstream" and time to upgrade. KDE 3.5.0/1 had grave bugs, leaving users with lost addressbooks and such. KDE 3.5.2 is not even out of our 30 days testing period and I have still a few patches enqueued to be applied. I can live with users complaining, but that doesn't mean it's not going on ones nerve. Especially when developers fall into the chorus, it's getting uneasy. It's ready, when it's ready. Really. Carsten
pgp5GodaAekLS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
