On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 00:41 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: > Stuart Herbert wrote: > What is the reason for the mask? Modular Xorg incompatibility in nx-x11?
Because it should not have been unmasked in the first place. That was a mistake on my part, to not notice that I hadn't masked it when I masked everything else. > I guess "testing" does not really count after two months in ~x86 It's an ebuild for an old snapshot of freenx. We have better ebuilds in the NX overlay, thanks to Jon Scruggs and everyone who's been contributing via bugzilla. Those ebuilds will be moved into Portage asap, just as soon as I've caught up on my code reviewing. The feedback from visitors to #gentoo-nx has been very positive (although I believe printing remains an issue atm). > By the way masking something afterwards is bad habit because it will cause > downgrades. Downgrades can be harmful because they can cause bugs to come > up again that have been fixed in the latest version. I'll time this so that the mask is added along with the latest ebuilds, so that, although it will look like a downgrade, what users will get will be much better. Best regards, Stu -- Stuart Herbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ http://blog.stuartherbert.com/ GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
