Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I just had somebody ask me about whether or not we still needed LDAP > help. It's a good question, and I didn't know the answer, which is > rather embarrassing since I'm the one who filed the LDAP staffing > request. Since then I believe that lcars had taken LDAP over, or is > otherwise assisting robbat2 (or the LDAP team, if we have one now). In > any event, I doubt that I'm the only irresponsible dev who's added an > entry to the staffing-needs page and forgot about it, so perhaps we need > to have items expire unless explicitly renewed? Thoughts?
I think this is a good idea. We have some items on there that are years
old, and it would be good to even update the requested date on them so
that people know the requests are still valid.
--
Mark Loeser - Gentoo Developer (cpp gcc-porting qa toolchain x86)
email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
mark AT halcy0n DOT com
web - http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/
http://www.halcy0n.com
pgpYJCDHK6xgy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
