On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 01:51:39PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: > I just had somebody ask me about whether or not we still needed LDAP > help. It's a good question, and I didn't know the answer, which is > rather embarrassing since I'm the one who filed the LDAP staffing > request. Since then I believe that lcars had taken LDAP over, or is > otherwise assisting robbat2 (or the LDAP team, if we have one now). I wouldn't call us a full team, just a small group of folk that have a mail alias (ldap-bugs), and try to handle bugs for LDAP. [robbat2, jokey, strerror]. I agree the LDAP docs need to be re-written, but that's a large undertaking.
> In any event, I doubt that I'm the only irresponsible dev who's added > an entry to the staffing-needs page and forgot about it, so perhaps > we need to have items expire unless explicitly renewed? Thoughts? I'm in favour of having expiry dates for requests yes. And somebody can change my request for app-backup staff down a priority level thanks. -- Robin Hugh Johnson E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
pgpdhvF46ay57.pgp
Description: PGP signature
