On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 00:11 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: > My opinion is "snap, crackle, and pop"... let the tree break. But better > yet... figure out what depends on package X <=1.0 and p.mask it.
Umm... anything that depends on the package in question *should* be getting masked. There's no opinion to it. Breaking the tree is a definite no-no. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
