On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:10:04 -0700 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 03:00:13PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: > > Paul de Vrieze wrote: [Thu Jun 01 2006, 02:44:39PM CDT] > > > I would like the council to discuss GLEP 49 > > Incidentally, I drafted a competing GLEP > Realize you'ure after keeping it open, but there is more to the tree
I would like the council to nail down the details of what package manager specific data can and cannot be put in gentoo-x86 as well as what the requirements and process of replacing or providing an alternative to portage will be. Getting the specifics down in writing will avoid a lot of headaches down the road as non-portage package managers mature. There are a lot of sides to this discussion, almost all of the possible view points were expressed on [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of it is available in the mailing list archives for review, so I'm also asking that the subscribers to [EMAIL PROTECTED] please refrain from starting another flamewar. -tcort
pgpInSj1J2hlr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
