Why are you hijacking tools not written by you, declaring 
them as 2.0 and breaking the expected behaviors of them?

Please don't do that ever again.

On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 21:24 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> I finally had a few free cycles, so I fixed up the eselect-compiler  
> ebuild to better handle the transition from gcc-config and updated  
> toolchain.eclass to better work with multilib.  I've had a bunch of  
> help from the amd64 devs/testers/users this past week testing it out,  
> and I think it's ready to be removed from package.mask sometime soon  
> (next week).  Before that happens, I'd like to get some feedback from  
> a broader test base, so if you have some time and aren't using  
> eselect-compiler yet, I'd appreciate your testing.  All you need to  
> do is add the following to /etc/portage/package.unmask:
> app-admin/eselect-conmpiler
> sys-devel/gcc-config
> then just update gcc-config:
> $ emerge -uv --oneshot sys-devel/gcc-config
> gcc-config is just a wrapper which takes the same syntax as the older  
> gcc-configs and makes the appropriate call to eselect-compiler.
> Please report any bugs you find in bugzilla and assign them directly  
> to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> Also, if you've been using eselect-compiler, you may have an issue  
> where your profiles don't get removed from /etc/eselect/compiler when  
> you unmerge gcc.  This problem is fixed now for future installs, but  
> you'll have to manually remove the file when you unmerge any gcc that  
> is on your system now.
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
Gentoo Linux

gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to