On Wednesday 21 June 2006 00:52, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Yes, you will need to introduce a qt4 flag as upstreams > port packages to qt5, if they choose to also retain a qt4 frontend. You're trying to compare gtk to qt directly. They are not the same. gtk regards only the graphic library, qt is a library of utility functions too. Qt can be considered like gtk+glib, and that make things more complex.
As I said, I'd rather see two flags, qt3 and qt4, to identify the two versions. A simpler alternative would be qt (defaults to 3) and qt4, but that's going to be confused on the long run to something similar to gtk. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
pgphRiuuiKxow.pgp
Description: PGP signature
