> I disagree with separate packages, if it's possible to build both at > once. That's the point of USE flags.
I'd say that's fine in the general case, but with a slotted package it's going to be extremely messy. I think we're in agreement that "qt" should represent the most recent version supported by the particular package. If people want to create local use flags for the older qt3 version, I suppose that's ok, but I think you're going to start running into using a lot of "build_with_use" statements to see if that version was built or not. It seems cleaner from the ebuild perspective just to be able to put in a dep on a package name rather than a pseudo-hack in order to support multiple interfaces via a single ebuild. Caleb -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
