On Wednesday 05 July 2006 14:48, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 21:09 -0400, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > > I'm open to arguments in favor of such a project, tho, if people have > > real plans. Certainly, an easier way to generate and maintain root > > filesystems for UML would be nice. > > As far as VMware is concerned, I see no point in this herd. All of the > VMware stuff is already managed by the VMware team, and is a part of the > vmware herd. Adding it to a broader herd won't improve VMware in any > way. The only thing it will do is ensure that the members of the VMware > team get emails about bugs in things they aren't interested in working > with, or have no knowledge of whatsoever.
i agree, same applies for the vserver herd (currently maintaining openvz and linux-vserver) > > If such a herd does form, leave VMware out of it, please. -- [email protected] mailing list
