On Friday 14 July 2006 11:09, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Friday 14 July 2006 16:43, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > While it is a "working" solution, it isn't necessarily a sensible one. > > You can take over xine-lib and fix it however you prefer. > > As this, as well as any other idea you can find, is just an HACK until > portage devs implements the per-package use.mask that i asked WAY before > 2.1 release, but was then left OUT of the freeze and thus of the featureset > we can use 6 months from now, I REFUSE to change the behaviour.
/me humps angry over worked flameeyes -mike
pgp8xnHpdzbVK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
