On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 01:19:41PM -0500, Lance Albertson wrote: > Wernfried Haas wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 05:35:53PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > >> On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:25:53 +0200 Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> wrote: > >> | So if by breaking the keyword someone breaks a policy, it is something > >> | devrel should and will deal with. > >> Should, sure. Care to back up the will part? > > > > Time travel is not possible, so i am not able to present you hard > > evidence. > > > > What i can assure you is that there is a policy that says so, and that > > policies are there to be followed. > > The point we're making here is, policies mean nothing if they can't be > backed up. The past has shown that not to happen, and until there's hard > evidence to show that something is actively being done, then the > assumption that nothing will happen will stand. I don't care how many > policies you come up with, they mean absolutely nothing if you can't > actively deal with the consequences.
Ok, so i guess it boils down to:
You and Chris believe devrel won't do anything based on your personal
judgement.
I believe devrel will do something based on my personal judgement.
Neither of this points can be proven right or wrong other than waiting
how it turns out. I hope time proves things don't stay the same for
all the time and things can change.
cheers,
Wernfried
--
Wernfried Haas (amne) - amne at gentoo dot org
Gentoo Forums: http://forums.gentoo.org
IRC: #gentoo-forums on freenode - email: forum-mods at gentoo dot org
pgpvWCwaRmHwq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
