Chris White wrote: > We have an alternative stated [1]. I think we need to focus more on the > problems of using the alternative, then dealing with what some consider to be > a rather sketchy legal dispute. > > [1] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debburn
WTH is debburn??? Geeez, make the folk respect GPL like everyone else, I don't want any debburn. Besides, we don't distribute any binaries (if we do on release media, we'll have to stop until JS regains a bit of mental sanity). -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
