Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 02:18:52 -0700 David Shakaryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | I have created a small script to go through entries in package.mask > | and list those which are masking non-existent packages or versions. I > | then used this list to clean up package.mask. I tried to only remove > | versions that were removed and have a newer version in place, along > | with packages that were removed, but I accidentally /might/ have > | removed other entries, although I doubt it. I kept masks for future > | versions in place, as the maintainer of the package might have wanted > | to mask it ahead of time. > > So what happens when users have an old, masked package installed that's > no longer masked thanks to this change?
Err, exactly nothing? If they didn't unmerge it, they'll continue to have it installed as they did before? -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
