Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > | As you have might have noticed, they already have a newer version > | stable. But apparently asking them to respond on a bug within 5 months > | is way too much. :P > > Well yes, since there's no clear link between bugs and packages. Things > can get stabled incidentally and for reasons other than the ones in one > particular bug.
Eh? Stabilizing for multiple security issues [1] is "incidental"?! [1] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-1516 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-1517 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-1518 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132146 What on earth are you talking about here? And why almost 6 months is not enough for someone to respond on a bug with a simple "we'll only support newer versions and don't care about MySQL 4.0.x any more, go drop it"? -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
