Mike Frysinger napsal(a): > On Wednesday 10 January 2007 18:36, Jakub Moc wrote: >> OK, dunno which of us is being dense; the whole point is that the damned >> ACCEPT_RESTRICT is completely redundant; hard to grok or what exactly? >> You already *don't* accept the restrict by sticking 'unattended' into >> FEATURES... WTH would you need to negate your FEATURES via another >> variable instead of simply altering the FEATURES (or not sticking such >> thing there in the first place?) > > did you even read his e-mail ? the GLEP isnt just about sandbox or > unattended ... i wont elaborate because i'll be copying & pasting his e-mail > -mike
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0052.html <snip> This GLEP proposes a new value for the RESTRICT metadata variable in ebuilds to indicate that an ebuild requires interaction by the user. ... Portage (and by extension other package managers) will support a new value for the RESTRICT metadata variable called unattended. </snip> Maybe you are talking about a different GLEP, or I simply don't get this new variable mania... -- Best regards, Jakub Moc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG signature: http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E ... still no signature ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
